Besides a long prospectus to become an architecture virtuoso for 5 years Architecture bears a lot of lessons outside the lecture halls and studios. Which seems like an eternity, both the curriculum and duration of it, the quinquennial teaching covers a wider spectrum than just planning, designing, and constructing buildings or other structures. 

A novice Architecture student, when leaps from school to college, he has ambitions and expectations. The naïve lad already begins building inconceivable structures in their utopia. Entirely unaware that architecture is beyond just construction. I think that given the lessons inside these institutions already recite stories of art, building science, structures, history, climatology along with others, but it still incurs to imbue erratic soft skills in an architecture student. It doesn’t just teach you how to become an architect or how to plan, draw, or construct, rather how to think like an architect.

Architecture is past “that the bathroom goes there” and “that window will look cool over there”. It is about finding constraints, understanding its components, turning those problems as opportunities, and seeking a solution to them. And, an architecture school will cover exercises and challenges either in form of given assignments or indirectly through abstract manner which will imbibe ARCHITECTURAL THINKING. 

The system of education is followed in such a school that doesn’t just make you ace one subject called architecture, but it is disintegrated into various other strata of learning which further dilutes to each subject linked with a firm passionate thought.

This is what I learned in such varied subjects:

  • Architectural Design
  • Discovering opportunities and constraints of a project
  • Learning human behavior and understanding the basic psychology of a given client
  • Rectifying problems and Searching for appropriate solutions 
  • Constantly switching between traditional hand-drawings and sketching with contemporary technology
  • Translating ideas through anything with or beyond graphics and words
  • Justifying design via communication and presentation skills
  • History 
  • Visiting diverse styles, culture, and timespan
  • Understanding evolution and technological changes
  • Linking time, culture, location, and climate
  • Learning from historic faults
  • Computer 
  • Learning modern methods of designing
  • Decoding files into different types based on user-comfort
  • Modeling beyond physical challenges
  • Graphic designing, layout, and presentation
  • Building materials and construction
  • Choosing materials with extreme advantages for a given project
  • Using material properties for maximum rewards
  • Learning details
  • Structures
  • Keeping structures erect and reliable 
  • Concerning structural knowledge to enhance the design
  • Visualizing practical and safe spaces
  • Considering forces against the building and its components
  • Relating materials with the strength
  • Basic mathematics and calculations
Building Minds, Crafting Architects Beyond Blueprints in Architecture Education - Sheet1
Architecture education_©Marc Goodwin

These are momentarily what specific exercises in colleges impart about architecture, yet if you ask an Architect, their learning is never constrained to this. It is mostly the in-betweens of these design glitches which aid in a true transformation of rudimentary to critical thinking.

  • Quality of space: applying to buildings, landscapes, and infrastructure, the quality of space enhances the living experience of the user clarifying that buildings are not just about the column, beam, and slab but they portray the experience that comes from living under such permutations and combinations of bricks. It teaches us about how visual attributes and the feeling of space can provide a different meaning to our design.
  • Embracing criticism: It is fairly common to see sheets being torn apart and month-long labor all in vain. But when a young student works endlessly, discovering new concepts only to come up with a solution that gets scorned by jurors and teachers. It is not the sardonic comments, but the disappointment that precedes it which brings utmost sadness. After such limitless happenstances, one learns to accept such denunciation which is not just ignored, but taken into account to improve designing.
  • Getting over mistakes: After accepting criticism, moving on is important, an idea we often learn at later stages of our education. It is fathomable that a lot of time and thought went into making a project, however, clinging to an uncertain or incorrect thought might be harmful. As soon as mistakes are rectified, they must be removed to prevent time wastage.
  • SELLING YOUR IDEA: despite criticism, a designer needs to be persuasive and convincing. In an Architecture school, you’ll notice many such tactics involving cool maquette models, 3D renders, innovative sketches, precise details, realistic walkthroughs, interactive animations, and sometimes even basic layouts. Decent demonstration encompasses such elements harmonizing descriptive illustrations/ diagrams and comprehendible yet resounding language.
  • Referencing smartly: Ideas are not always a Eureka strategy, It strikes you anytime anywhere, amidst the serene hills and the clam lake, or your toilet. Sometimes you’ll end up with hours of scrolling through sites to see already made construction. You don’t learn to get more ideas but how to seek them.
  • Building Minds, Crafting Architects Beyond Blueprints in Architecture Education - Sheet2
    Architecture discussion_GaudiLab

    All about the details: Intricate. Elaborate. Descriptive.

That is how design is read. For armatures, detailing resides in the drafting sheets but instead it is the inclusive thought of such designs. An architect learns to pay attention to the intricacies in different concepts in design and construction. Those are details.

  • Construction v/s design: The undergraduate begins to appreciate the need of a designer and understands why computers and algorithms fail to design spaces as they can’t change the emotion it brings.
  • An amalgamation of science and art: Architecture is one of the only fields which require both logical and abstract thinking. An architect needs to design according to statistics of climate, location, material appropriateness, building stability, ventilation, etc. And with all that in mind, he still manages to impart and artsy feel to it. It is not mostly the curvier edges or uniqueness of materials chosen but sometimes how an architect manages to satisfy all logistics along with client requirements that depict the real creativity.
  • Respecting all fields: A designer is expected to work in a team, with fellow architects, clients, contractors, structural engineers, laborers, and many other people from different backgrounds. Thus, an architecture student never thinks too highly of themselves and can be spotted publicly sketching, taking measurements, or carrying hefty models across campus.
Author

Swara is an architect and a keen traveler with a significant interest in writing and blogging. She likes to work on exploratory yet grounded approaches and understands architecture from the perspective of human values and sensitivity. She believes that if drawings speak more, words articulate the most.